

Episode # 54 • 07 Apr 2026
Clinical Advances in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Don’t miss the “curative window”! This episode takes a closer look at how evolving perioperative strategies and biomarker integration are changing bladder cancer care, with a focus on preserving opportunities for cure. Jun Gong hosts Tyler Stewart to review key bladder cancer updates from ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium 2026.
Timestamps
00:00 - Introduction
01:50 - KEYNOTE-905 Overview
07:09 - Practice-Changing Takeaways
13:28 - Bladder Preservation Trials
16:06 - ctDNA Biomarker Updates
21:16 - Using ctDNA in Clinic
28:48 - Metastatic ADC Data
33:36 - Wrap-Up
Resources
You may also like
More about this episode
The discussion begins with KEYNOTE-905/EV-303 in cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer, where perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab demonstrated improvements in event-free and overall survival. This is followed by KEYNOTE-B15, which compares perioperative EVP with gemcitabine/cisplatin and identifies EVP as the first non-platinum regimen to outperform cisplatin-based therapy. Implications for clinical adoption are considered, including the potential for EVP to extend across cisplatin eligibility groups, unresolved questions regarding perioperative duration and adjuvant use, and the need to avoid premature de-escalation outside of trial settings.
The latter portion of the episode focuses on biomarker-driven decision-making. Data from RETAIN-2 highlight the prognostic value of post-neoadjuvant ctDNA positivity for systemic relapse risk, while underscoring its limitations in detecting intravesical recurrence. Complementary findings from NIAGARA suggest that urine tumor DNA may more accurately reflect local disease burden and pathologic complete response. Together, these studies frame an evolving role for circulating and urine-based biomarkers in guiding surveillance, treatment selection, and timing—central considerations in maintaining the curative window.
The Materials available on BackTable are provided for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the independent professional judgment of a qualified healthcare professional in diagnosing or treating patients. Any opinions, statements, or views expressed are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, platform, or any affiliated organization.