top of page
Cardiogenic Shock Management: Latest Strategies & Innovations with Dr. Amir Kaki, Dr. Sameh Sayfo on the BackTable Cardiology Podcast
00:00 / 01:04

Save your progress. Continue watching on the BackTable app.

BackTable Cardiology

Episode # 2  •  16 Sept 2025

Cardiogenic Shock Management: Latest Strategies & Innovations

In 2024, the DanGer Shock trial changed cardiogenic shock guidelines and affected practice patterns internationally. This episode of the BackTable Cardiology Podcast explores tips, tricks, and best practices in utilizing Impella, ECMO, and national initiatives to most effectively treat patients with cardiogenic shock. Host Dr. Sameh Sayfo interviews Dr. Amir Kaki, a noted interventional cardiologist and Director of Mechanical Circulatory Support and Complex PCI at Henry Ford St. John Hospital in Detroit.

Timestamps

00:00 - Introduction
02:12 - National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative
06:23 - Shock 2 Trial
07:48 - ECLS-SHOCK Trial and ECMO
15:05 - DanGer Trial
22:56 - Parameters for Impella RP vs Impella CP Use in Cardiogenic Shock
29:39 - Impella Considerations: Placement, Limb Ischemia, Removal
37:56 - Modern Cardiogenic Shock: Overview and Resources
40:16 - Conclusion

Resources

You may also like

See more of the content that's relevant to your practice.

More about this episode

The discussion centers on the advances in mechanical circulatory support devices like Impella and ECMO, their history, usage criteria, and impact on patient outcomes. Dr. Kaki details the landmark Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative, the challenges surrounding ECMO use, and the critical implementation of the recent DanGer-SHOCK Trial in clinical practice. After outlining the history of interventions for cardiogenic shock and the significance of recent trials within the field, he emphasizes the necessity for contemporary cardiologists to be skilled in endovascular techniques.

The Materials available on BackTable are provided for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the independent professional judgment of a qualified healthcare professional in diagnosing or treating patients. Any opinions, statements, or views expressed are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, platform, or any affiliated organization.

bottom of page