top of page
Advancements in Pulmonary Embolus Intervention Techniques: PEERLESS Trial Insights with Dr. Ripal Gandhi, Dr. Zarina Sharalaya on the BackTable VI Podcast
00:00 / 01:04

Save your progress. Continue watching on the BackTable app.

BackTable Vascular & Interventional

Episode # 508  •  14 Jan 2025

Advancements in Pulmonary Embolus Intervention Techniques: PEERLESS Trial Insights

Interventional treatment for pulmonary embolism (PE) has significantly evolved in recent years, largely due to advancements in techniques, knowledge, and device technology. Dr. Zarina Sharalaya (interventional and structural cardiologist) and Dr. Ripal Gandhi (interventional radiologist) join host Dr. Chris Beck to discuss the evolving landscape of PE treatment, comparing large-bore mechanical thrombectomy with catheter-directed thrombolysis and exploring outcomes from the PEERLESS randomized control trial.

This podcast is supported by

Inari Medical

Timestamps

00:00 - Introduction
08:01 - Pulmonary Embolism Risk Stratification and Treatment Algorithms
14:49 - Procedure Overview
24:25 - Best Practices and Techniques in Thrombectomy
34:31 - Peerless Study Overview and Findings
46:50 - Gender Differences in PE Treatment
47:49 - Future of PE Treatment and Advice
51:55 - Case Presentations and Clinical Insights

Resources

You may also like

See more of the content that's relevant to your practice.

More about this episode

Dr. Sharalaya and Dr. Gandhi begin by covering risk stratification and treatment algorithms for their patients with PE. The doctors then go onto discuss the procedure in detail, and best practices and techniques for mechanical thrombectomy. The conversation also focuses on the PEERLESS trial, highlighting how the study showed significant benefits of mechanical thrombectomy, including faster symptom improvement, decreased ICU stay, and reduced readmission rates. Dr. Sharalaya and Dr. Gandhi conclude the episode with a series of case presentations.

The Materials available on BackTable are provided for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the independent professional judgment of a qualified healthcare professional in diagnosing or treating patients. Any opinions, statements, or views expressed are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, platform, or any affiliated organization.

bottom of page