.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
BackTable / VI / Article
Carotid Endarterectomy vs Stent: Indications & Outcomes
Bryant Schmitz • Updated Oct 2, 2025 • 37 hits
Carotid revascularization is an important intervention for stroke prevention in patients with significant carotid artery stenosis. The two primary options are carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). CEA has been performed for decades and remains a well-established surgical approach, while CAS provides a minimally invasive alternative that can be particularly valuable in high-risk surgical candidates.
Each technique carries specific procedural risks and long-term outcomes that must be considered in the context of patient comorbidities, anatomical challenges, and institutional expertise. Understanding the evidence behind carotid endarterectomy vs stent allows clinicians to determine which approach offers the best balance of safety and efficacy for individual patients.
Table of Contents
(1) Anatomy & Pathophysiology of Carotid Stenosis
(2) Carotid Endarterectomy: Technique & Clinical Considerations
(3) Carotid Artery Stenting: Technique & Patient Selection
(4) Comparative Outcomes: Carotid Endarterectomy vs Stent
(5) Patient-Specific Factors Influencing Choice
(6) Perioperative Risks & Complications
(7) Long-Term Follow-Up & Secondary Prevention
Anatomy & Pathophysiology of Carotid Stenosis
Carotid stenosis typically occurs at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery, where turbulent flow predisposes to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Plaques may ulcerate and embolize, leading to transient ischemic attacks or ischemic stroke. Hemodynamically significant stenosis is generally defined as ≥50% narrowing on imaging, with the risk of stroke increasing proportionally to the degree of stenosis.
Diagnosis is most often established with duplex ultrasound, which provides both structural and flow velocity data. CT angiography and MR angiography are used for further assessment and surgical or endovascular planning. Identifying symptomatic vs asymptomatic disease is central to determining the threshold for intervention.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Carotid Endarterectomy: Technique & Clinical Considerations
Carotid endarterectomy involves surgical exposure of the carotid bifurcation, followed by removal of the atherosclerotic plaque from the arterial wall. Intraoperative strategies may include temporary shunting to maintain cerebral perfusion and patch angioplasty to reduce restenosis risk. Both general and regional anesthesia are used depending on patient factors and surgeon preference.
CEA is indicated for symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and for select asymptomatic patients with ≥60% stenosis, particularly when life expectancy exceeds five years and perioperative risk is low. Randomized trials have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing stroke risk in properly selected patients.
Carotid Artery Stenting: Technique & Patient Selection
Carotid artery stenting is performed via transfemoral or transradial access. After crossing the lesion, an embolic protection device is typically deployed to reduce the risk of distal embolization during stent placement. Balloon angioplasty may be performed before or after stent deployment to optimize luminal expansion.
CAS offers advantages in shorter recovery time, avoidance of neck incision, and applicability in patients with prior neck surgery, radiation, or difficult surgical exposure. It is generally reserved for patients at high surgical risk, those with restenosis after CEA, or when open surgery is contraindicated. Careful patient selection and operator experience are essential for minimizing complications.
Comparative Outcomes: Carotid Endarterectomy vs Stent
Large trials, including CREST and ICSS, have provided head-to-head comparisons between CEA and CAS. CEA has consistently shown lower rates of periprocedural stroke, while CAS is associated with fewer myocardial infarctions. Long-term durability is generally favorable for both procedures, although CEA may carry a slightly lower risk of restenosis.
Meta-analyses suggest that age is an important modifier of outcomes, with younger patients having comparable results between CAS and CEA, while older patients experience higher periprocedural stroke rates with stenting. Both procedures reduce the risk of recurrent stroke when applied to appropriate candidates.
Patient-Specific Factors Influencing Choice
The decision between carotid endarterectomy vs. stent depends on individual risk profiles. Patients over age 70 tend to benefit more from CEA due to lower stroke risk, while younger patients may tolerate stenting with similar outcomes.
Anatomic considerations also guide selection. High cervical lesions, prior neck surgery, or radiation may favor CAS, while patients with challenging vascular access or heavily calcified lesions may be better suited for CEA. Comorbid conditions such as severe cardiopulmonary disease can shift the balance toward stenting to avoid surgical stress.
Perioperative Risks & Complications
CEA carries risks of cranial nerve injury, neck hematoma, and wound complications, though these are usually transient. Stroke remains the most significant concern, emphasizing the need for meticulous surgical technique.
CAS risks include embolic stroke, access site hematoma, and in-stent restenosis. Dual antiplatelet therapy is required perioperatively to minimize thrombotic complications, which may limit its use in patients with bleeding risk. Both approaches benefit from multidisciplinary assessment to minimize complications.
Long-Term Follow-Up & Secondary Prevention
Following either CEA or CAS, patients require long-term surveillance with duplex ultrasound to detect restenosis. The frequency of follow-up depends on early postoperative findings and risk factors for recurrent disease.
Secondary prevention strategies are essential for all patients regardless of intervention. These include lifelong statin therapy, antihypertensive management, and antiplatelet therapy. Smoking cessation, diet modification, and exercise remain fundamental for reducing future cardiovascular risk and optimizing outcomes.
Additional resources:
[1] Brott, T. G., et al. (2010). Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912321
[2] International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. (2010). Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 375(9719), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5
[3] Abbott, A. L. (2009). Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke, 40(10), e573–e583. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068
[4] Ricotta, J. J., et al. (2011). Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 54(3), e1–e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031
[5] Howard, G., & Howard, V. J. (2021). Twenty-year follow-up of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial. Stroke, 52(2), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031200
Podcast Contributors
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2025, September 2). Ep. 569 – Advances & Challenges in Carotid Artery Stenting [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.
Podcasts
Articles
Carotid Artery Treatment Without Surgery