.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
BackTable / ENT / Article
Turbinate Reduction: Surgery, Recovery & Risks
Bryant Schmitz • Updated Oct 2, 2025 • 40 hits
Turbinate reduction is a surgical option for patients with persistent nasal obstruction caused by turbinate hypertrophy. While intranasal corticosteroids, antihistamines, and saline irrigations remain the first line of treatment, some patients continue to experience obstruction. In these cases, inferior turbinate reduction may be considered, as the inferior turbinate contributes the most to airway resistance. The procedure targets soft tissue or bony enlargement of the turbinates, whereas septoplasty addresses deviation of the nasal septum. Because these conditions often occur together, combining septoplasty & turbinate reduction can be the most effective approach to restoring nasal airflow.
Table of Contents
(1) What is a Turbinate Reduction?
(2) Indications for Turbinate Reduction Surgery
(3) Types of Turbinate Reduction Procedures
(4) Pros & Cons of Turbinate Reduction
(5) Turbinate Reduction Recovery
(6) Turbinate Reduction Side Effects & Risks
(7) Septoplasty & Turbinate Reduction: Combined Approach
(8) Long-Term Outcomes & Management
What is a Turbinate Reduction?
Turbinate reduction is a procedure designed to decrease the size of the nasal turbinates, improving airflow and relieving nasal obstruction. The inferior turbinate is the most common target for reduction due to its prominent role in regulating airway resistance.
Unlike septoplasty, which repositions or reshapes the nasal septum, turbinate reduction addresses soft tissue swelling or bony hypertrophy within the turbinates. Both procedures may be performed separately or together depending on the patient’s anatomy and symptoms.
Listen to the Full Podcast
Stay Up To Date
Follow:
Subscribe:
Sign Up:
Indications for Turbinate Reduction Surgery
Turbinate reduction surgery is indicated in patients with chronic nasal obstruction that does not improve with maximal medical therapy. Common causes include allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, or vasomotor rhinitis. Compensatory hypertrophy, often seen in patients with septal deviation, is another frequent reason for surgical intervention.
Adult patients are most commonly candidates, though turbinate reduction may also be considered in select pediatric cases with severe obstruction. Careful evaluation with nasal endoscopy or imaging helps determine whether turbinate reduction, septoplasty, or both are needed.
Types of Turbinate Reduction Procedures
Several surgical options exist for turbinate reduction, each with advantages and limitations:
• Submucosal resection: Removes bone or soft tissue beneath the mucosa while preserving surface lining, reducing the risk of dryness and atrophic rhinitis.
• Radiofrequency ablation: Uses controlled energy to shrink turbinate tissue with minimal downtime, often performed in the office.
• Microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty: Provides precise removal of soft tissue with preservation of mucosa.
• Partial turbinectomy: Involves excision of part of the turbinate, reserved for severe cases.
Selection of technique depends on the degree of hypertrophy, surgeon preference, and whether the procedure is performed in an office or operating room setting.
Pros & Cons of Turbinate Reduction
Pros:
• Improved nasal airflow and breathing comfort.
• Reduction in chronic nasal obstruction symptoms.
• Potential improvement in sleep quality and reduced snoring.
Cons:
• Outcomes vary depending on the cause of obstruction.
• Some patients may require repeat procedures due to recurrent hypertrophy.
• Potential side effects include nasal dryness, crusting, or altered airflow sensation.
Understanding the pros and cons of turbinate reduction helps set realistic expectations for both physicians and patients.
Turbinate Reduction Recovery
Recovery following turbinate reduction surgery is generally well tolerated. Patients typically experience congestion, crusting, and mild nasal discomfort in the first one to two weeks. Saline irrigations, intranasal corticosteroids, and routine follow-up visits support healing and reduce the risk of synechiae formation.
Most patients notice gradual improvement in breathing within two to four weeks, with continued improvement over several months. Return to work and normal activities is usually possible within a few days, depending on the surgical technique used.
Turbinate Reduction Side Effects & Risks
Turbinate reduction is generally safe, but risks include nasal dryness, crusting, bleeding, or infection. Infrequent complications include synechiae formation or persistent obstruction. Over-resection, particularly in aggressive turbinectomy, may lead to atrophic rhinitis or empty nose syndrome, underscoring the importance of mucosal preservation. Long-term risks are reduced when conservative tissue-sparing techniques are used. Surgeons typically balance reduction of turbinate volume with preservation of function.
Septoplasty & Turbinate Reduction: Combined Approach
Septoplasty & turbinate reduction are frequently performed together in patients with both septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy. Septoplasty alone may not fully restore nasal airflow if turbinate hypertrophy persists. Similarly, turbinate reduction without correcting septal deviation may result in incomplete relief. Combining the two procedures addresses both structural and soft tissue causes of obstruction, leading to improved outcomes in carefully selected patients.
Long-Term Outcomes & Management
Long-term outcomes of turbinate reduction depend on both surgical technique and ongoing medical management of underlying conditions. Patients with allergic or inflammatory causes of turbinate hypertrophy often require continued use of nasal corticosteroids or allergen avoidance strategies. Most patients report durable symptom relief, but recurrence can occur, particularly in those with uncontrolled allergic rhinitis or chronic inflammation. In select cases, repeat procedures may be necessary.
Additional resources:
[1] Lam, D. J., James, K. T., & Weiss, R. L. (2003). Comparison of radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction and submucosal resection for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. The Laryngoscope, 113(5), 882-886. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200305000-00025
[2] Ciprandi, G., Cirillo, I., & Vizzaccaro, A. (2003). Nasal obstruction and inferior turbinate hypertrophy in allergic rhinitis: Effect of topical mometasone. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 90(3), 234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62173-5
[3] Berger, G., & Ophir, D. (2000). The inferior turbinate: Histological and histochemical changes in response to submucosal electrocauterization. The Laryngoscope, 110(3 Pt 1), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200003000-00027
Podcast Contributors
Dr. Colleen Plein
Dr. Colleen Plein is a practicing otolaryngologist in Milwaukee and Chicago.
Dr. Ashley Agan
Dr. Ashley Agan is an otolaryngologist in Dallas, TX.
Dr. Gopi Shah
Dr. Gopi Shah is a pediatric otolaryngologist and the co-host of BackTable ENT.
Cite This Podcast
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2022, September 27). Ep. 71 – Nasal vs. Mouth Breathing: Does it Matter? [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.
Podcasts
Articles
Why is Mouth Breathing Bad? A Clinical Condition, Not Just A Bad Habit
Clinical Evaluation & Treatment of Chronic Mouth Breathing
Empty Nose Syndrome: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Solutions
ENT In-Office Procedures