BackTable / Urology / Podcast / Episode #11
Evaluation & Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
with Dr. Steve Hudak and Dr. Aditya Bagrodia
Dr. Aditya Bagrodia interviews urologist Dr. Steve Hudak from UT Southwestern Medical Center about post-prostatectomy incontinence. They cover an array of topics including, incontinence evaluation, managing patient expectations, kegel exercises and pelvic floor therapy, and slings vs. artificial urinary sphincters.
BackTable, LLC (Producer). (2021, July 14). Ep. 11 – Evaluation & Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.backtable.com
Reflect on how this Podcast applies to your day-to-day and earn free AMA PRA Category 1 CMEs. Follow the button below to claim your credits on CMEfy.
Stay Up To Date
Dr. Steve Hudak
Dr. Steven Hudak is a practicing Urologist and an Associate Professor in the Department of Urology at UT Southwestern Medical Center.
Dr. Aditya Bagrodia
Dr. Aditya Bagrodia is an associate professor of urology and genitourinary oncology team leader at UC San Diego Health in California and adjunct professor of urology at UT Southwestern.
In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Aditya Bagrodia discusses post-prostatectomy incontinence with UT Southwestern urologist Dr. Steve Hudak. Urinary leakage is very common after the post-prostatectomy catheter is removed. Although the majority of men will regain continence in the long-term, 10-20% will need further treatment for their incontinence.
First, Dr. Hudak emphasizes the importance of comprehensive incontinence evaluation in the clinic. He prefers to schedule two different appointments to make incontinent patients feel more comfortable; he will only take a good medical history in the first appointment and save the cystoscopy and more provocative maneuvers for the second appointment. Dr. Hudak's clinical evaluation consists of a variety of quality of life questions as well as specific questions about pad weight, pad quantity, and pad size.
Further incontinence treatment can be non-surgical or surgical. Among the non-surgical therapies, Dr. Hudak suggests Kegel exercises and pelvic floor physical therapy. Dr. Hudak encourages urologists to explore these non-surgical options with their patients first. When deciding to move onto surgical intervention, Dr. Hudak explains that the trajectory of improvement is more important than a generalized timeframe because surgery is most effective in the time period in which a patient’s progress plateaus.
Pelvic slings and the artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) are the two most common surgical techniques for resolving urinary incontinence. Urologists must take into account their incontinence patients’ medical status, progress, goals, severity of leakage, and age before deciding whether to place a pelvic sling or an AUS. Dr. Hudak notes that the AUS is preferable in patients with severe arthritis, patients who have received radiation therapy, and patients with gravity incontinence. Two possible complications with the AUS are infection and erosion, as the AUS is a mechanical device with a half-life of seven to ten years. The sling is preferable in patients with mild incontinence, as it is a less invasive surgical technique and has a minimal risk of infection.
In some cases, it is possible that post-prostatectomy patients will also need post-operative radiation, so it is crucial to time the incontinence surgery correctly. Dr. Hudak recommends performing sling surgery before radiation, but concedes that radiation treatment should not be delayed solely due to incontinence surgery. His rule of thumb is: perform surgery if radiation is presumed, but not planned. If he has to perform surgery after radiation therapy, he waits at least 3-6 months after radiation to do so, allowing his patients to restore to their baseline levels of health.
So I personally don't like to go in there guns blazing and say, I'm "Dr. Hudak. I'm your surgeon. We're going to fix this with more surgery on the first day." I like to use that first visit, rather, to take a good history, use the 15 or 20 minutes in that appointment, really, to get to know their problem and to allow them to be comfortable with the plan of evaluating it, not jumping directly into surgery. So that first visit for me, again, is a history, a gaining of a two-way rapport, and then a little bit of education about the options that are available. If it appears to be pure or at least mixed stress incontinence, I'll give them some online and in-print materials about the options, and then leave it at that. I don't do an invasive physical exam, I don't do any invasive testing on that first visit. I do the history, I give them some information, and then if they're interested I'll set up a very short-term follow-up where we'll do a cystoscopy, some provocative maneuvers, a physical examination, and a residual check.
Disclaimer: The Materials available on BackTable.com are for informational and educational purposes only and are not a substitute for the professional judgment of a healthcare professional in diagnosing and treating patients. The opinions expressed by participants of the BackTable Podcast belong solely to the participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of BackTable.